Search for: "US v. Davis"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 4,726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
” This definition thus used the singular to describe the study and to describe the range of values. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
”-- The Attorneys General in 26 of the States think that Congress made a mistake: They are of the view that broccoli isn’t all that important and that federal tax dollars are wasted if they are used to pay for broccoli distribution. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Davis L. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Davis L. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm
Clarence Davies, Mark A.Greenwood and Andy Igrejas, panelists. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:36 am
Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:34 am
Gary Davis from Ireland, perhaps a tad controversially for a data protection deputy commissioner, noted that there seemed to be emerging agreement on trading personal data for free web 2.0 services, but the question was, how much data was too much data; and Bruce Schneier (no link needed!) [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 10:17 am
E.g., Davis at 187 tbl.1; see also Dist. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:00 am
In Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:00 am
In Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:02 am
Before Brown v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm
I note however, that the author of the SCR, Marion Davis, is reported as telling the guardian that the judge “permitted” the letter to be sent, which is materially different from the SCR. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:54 am
Moreover, their use was strictly limited to that case only, similar to disclosure of confidential information under the Court's Protective Order. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 10:36 am
On Day 4 of the FTC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Although marriage is a fundamental right, this is not a case—like Loving or, more recently, Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 12:04 am
The judges restated their positions in additional detail on Tuesday -- only this time Bybee was writing in dissent as Graber penned the 8-7 majority opinion in a strikingly contentious en banc case, in Doe v. [read post]
