Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 11,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2009, 12:54 pm
Gentry v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:21 am
In Intellectual Ventures I LLC, et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 4:50 am
In 1981 the Supreme Court in New York v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 5:07 am
V. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:03 am
But English isn’t Latin. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 12:03 pm
[v].) [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:24 pm
In the case of Rubio Dosamantes v Spain (Judgment of 21 February 2017)(in French only) the Third Section held that the dismissal of the applicant’s domestic claims was a breach of her Article 8 rights. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
Against the backdrop of this coverage, the English and Welsh press protested vigorously about their being prevented from publishing information. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
As a matter of principle, Part I could be excluded if, on facts, the juridical seat is outside India or the law governing the arbitration agreement is a law other than Indian law , as was held in Union of India v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday afternoon, an eleven-judge en banc Ninth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:39 am
The Court will consider whether the Danish Customs and Tax Administration’s (“SKAT”) claims for the recovery of tax refunds made to the appellants are not admissible before the English courts by reason of Rule 3(1) of Dicey, Morris & Collins on the Conflict of Laws, which says that “English courts have no jurisdiction to entertain an action… for the enforcement, either directly or indirectly, of a penal, revenue or other public law of a foreign… [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 9:19 am
On Wednesday 5 October and Thursday 6 October, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal in AMT Futures Ltd v Marzillier & Ors, which requires the court to consider whether the English Court has jurisdiction to try the case under Brussels I (Regulation No 44/2001). [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
By contrast, courts in California and Canada have found a contractual jurisdiction and applicable law clause invalid as a matter of public policy in order to allow a class action privacy claim to proceed against Facebook.[6] In England, the dual challenge of jurisdiction and collective actions in a mass privacy infringement claim has presented itself before the English Courts, first in Vidal-Hall v Google before the Court of Appeal in 2015[7] and in the Supreme Court judgment of… [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:27 am
An earlier post on this blog by Mark Tushnet explained that Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 2:29 am
See Matal v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 10:22 am
Finally, the Court highlighted that Sony had not improved on this position during litigation, for example by clearly demonstrating that it was willing to take a licence.SummaryOnly last month, the English Patents Court was hearing arguments in the case of Conversant v ZTE about the Chinese courts’ familiarity with FRAND proceedings (see IPKat report here), in connection with a jurisdiction challenge. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:56 am
From State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 5:56 am
In Rahmatullah v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
The current version, the English Arbitration Act 1996, applies to ad hoc arbitrations conducted in the United Kingdom. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
The current version, the English Arbitration Act 1996, applies to ad hoc arbitrations conducted in the United Kingdom. [read post]
