Search for: "Green v. State" Results 4401 - 4420 of 6,119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 11:05 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
The Report provides a green light for companies that rely on the Privacy Shield for their transatlantic data flow. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 4:22 pm by Patricia Salkin
In Louisville’s “downtown business area,” there was no 700–feet rule limiting the concentration of retail drink licenses, just as there was no such rule in Lexington or Bowling Green. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm by Michelle Briggs
Single colors have been granted protection under trademark law in various other industries, such as pink for insulation and green for laundry pads. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:31 am by Daniel Deacon
The descriptive account also suggests that the Supreme Court’s decision in Oil States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:30 pm by Schachtman
Green, Williams Professor of Law, Wake Forest University School of Law – Joseph Sanders, A.A. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
In addition, 35 governments--but unfortunately not the United States, Canada, Japan, or Russia--committed to a new Kyoto Protocol commitment period with binding commitments, which will begin in January 2013.Beyond these big picture developments, COP17 represented progress on a number of the Cancun commitments to helping developing countries with funding through the Green Climate Fund; adaptation assistance through the Adaptation Committee; obtaining and implementing technology… [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:12 pm by Steve Hall
  The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:37 am by Steve Baird
In support of its federal dilution claim, Wawa points to a 1997 federal trademark dilution decision (Wawa v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/820295.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 remains unamended by the rulings in  Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 849 and Greens and MT v United Kingdom (23 November 2010) that it offends against Article 3 Protocol 1 by imposing a blanket ban on prisoners from participating in elections. [read post]