Search for: "In re Weaks" Results 4401 - 4420 of 8,409
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
Next, Magverz feebly argued that WELLS is a weak term, citing eleven registered marks: SIMPLY WELL, WELLMADE, WELLABY'S, OPTIWELL, WELLTHY CHOCOLATES, MEDWELL FOODS, WEL CREAM DESSERTS, TEACH THEM WELL, SOY WELL, EAT WELL BE WELL, and OATWELL. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 11:04 am by Trevor Covey
(In re Southeastern Milk Antitrust Litig.), 739 F.3d 262, 283 (6th Cir. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
In Wednesday’s post, I discussed how many of these roadblocks fall away if you’re in a private prison. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm by Shelby Everest
By incorporating such a clause, it can save the seller embarrassment that, in some circles, comes with exposing a weak financial position. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm by Shelby Everest
By incorporating such a clause, it can save the seller embarrassment that, in some circles, comes with exposing a weak financial position. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 10:46 am
By incorporating such a clause, it can save the seller embarrassment that, in some circles, comes with exposing a weak financial position. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 5:40 am by Rob Howse
  At first glance it is fairly interesting as an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the discipline. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm by Ron Coleman
 We’re the Model-Alphabet-Letter guys here! [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 10:05 am
  We’re not sure what else to say about this case and these types of complaints. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 9:30 am by Karen Tani
This narrative shows the weakness of evolutionist approaches that assume the creation of the actio popularis (unconstitutionality) as an unavoidable continuation and development of a supposed "constitutional judicial review" established since 1886, and even of those who claim that such a judicial review had started a long time ago.The full paper is available here. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:45 am
Worth a read, even if you’re not interested in the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Inconsistency isn’t itself a vice, but there’s a particular problem when the inconsistency favors the presently powerful and dominant, which is explicitly what trademark law does: it protects strong brands more than new or weak entrants, and dilution in particular only protects famous marks, which is to say household names.So I’ve identified a tension in the treatment of private torts targeting emotional methods of persuasion. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  But it has its weaknesses, as Black and Douglas pointed out in concurrence: actual malice test invites inquiries. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 6:48 pm by Patti Waller
If you or a family member became ill with Botulism after consuming food and you’re interested in pursuing a legal claim, contact the Marler Clark Botulism attorneys for a free case evaluation. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:07 am
*     *     * So, after discarding the faith-based prison studies tainted by self-selection bias, we’re left with two studies that find no effect of faith-based programs, one study that’s too small to be meaningful, and three studies that find some effect, even if the effect that a few of these find is quite weak. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:29 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
They’re not necessarily looking for dirt, they’re looking for evidence of your skill, passion, and reputation. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:48 pm by Dan Harris
 Being self‐aware means knowing your values, goals, likes, dislikes, needs, drives, strengths and weaknesses, and their effect on your behavior. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 2:12 pm by Scott Grabel
In some cases, prosecutors will offer a defendant a plea agreement when the evidence to support a conviction is weak, or to speed the case through the system. [read post]