Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 51,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2011, 5:05 am
In a recent case, Goodman v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 5:13 am
Michael Steinberg Colorado Criminal Defense Lawyer Introduction – A Massive ChangeTo Plea Bargains in the Colorado Criminal Justice System Quietly, with little fanfare, the Colorado Supreme Court, in the case of People of the State of Colorado, v. [read post]
15 Sep 2012, 9:40 pm
In that lengthy post, I described the procedural history of People v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:51 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 12:41 pm
Trinitas Hospital case keeps growing. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 6:16 am
The case, White v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 9:31 pm
(Brunner v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:42 am
On June 1, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued an order amending its May 25, 2010 order in People v Tate, No. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 4:53 pm
(People), No. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 10:04 am
To address that question, the Arizona Court of Appeals, in the case of Hammett v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 12:14 pm
Feldman et al v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
Just a quick post about the Hill v Haines case, which went before the Court of Appeal this week, and which I've mentioned previously. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:00 am
According to a recent court of appeal opinion, People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 10:56 am
The case, People’s Tr. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:13 am
The case arose from a dispute between consumers and companies that issue low-rate credit cards to people with bad credit. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 1:25 pm
Hopefully they can help people make informed judgements about his federal criminal case. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 6:25 am
In People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 3:21 pm
Today in People v Young, 2007 NY Slip Op 05558, the First Department reiterated a previous holding that when a defendant forfeits his right to be present at trial, a trial court is not obligated to acquire and employ some type of electronic communication device so that the defendant can monitor the proceedings. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 2:25 pm
Wainwright and unanimously ruled later that year on March 18 at 372 U.S. 335 that states had the obligation to provide counsel for defendants who are unable to afford an attorney, extending the Constitutional right to counsel in criminal cases to poor and low-income people. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 11:47 am
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court hears oral argument in the most anticipated case of the term, DC v. [read post]
