Search for: "S S V STATE OF MICHIGAN"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 6,372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
State of Indiana Willie Eaton v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
The case was Michigan Workmen’s Compensation Agency v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
Lorentzen (Michigan law mandating 20 years’ imprisonment for sale of marijuana ruled cruel and unusual under state and federal constitutions); People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:01 am
One opinion addressing personal jurisdiction over key defendants, in a diversity case, is Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 11:41 am
What Judge Frank Easterbrook once said about the Supreme Court’s civil liberties cases likely applies to Dawson v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:24 am
From Mercer v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 11:31 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Jacobson v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 2:00 am
Jamie blogged earlier this week about the Supreme Court’s ruling in Montgomery v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:11 am
After each case I will put my gut reaction (without any actual research on the issue).Michigan v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:28 pm
I was a political reporter for much of my career, with long stints covering the Illinois General Assembly and state government in Springfield. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:02 am
In a remand from the Michigan Supreme Court directing the Court of Appeals to consider Lee’s appeal of this requirement, the Court of Appeals affirmed, in People v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:50 am
Following the Illinois Supreme Court’s decision in Rosenbach v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Blackston, 15-161, a state-on-top habeas case that asked whether a Michigan court’s denial of a defendant’s request to introduce two witnesses’ written recantations of their testimony was a Confrontation Clause violation. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:39 am
The case is Franasiak v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 4:51 am
In Hardrick v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 6:34 am
Sexton sued the company in state court for violating Michigan’s Whistleblower Protection Act and for breaching his employment contract. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm
(Mass.) 1999); Kim v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:56 pm
California, for if there it had adopted a robust conception of forfeiture doctrine it almos tcertainly would have avoided the very unfortunate reuslt in Michigan v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:23 am
Michigan's jurisdiction over the child also may be tested in the pending appeal. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:23 am
Michigan's jurisdiction over the child also may be tested in the pending appeal. [read post]
