Search for: "Small v. People" Results 4401 - 4420 of 8,516
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2015, 12:47 pm by Jeremy
This got short shrift from the judge who quoted the Hoffman v Dare judgment. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 8:16 pm
” Those men, though, would probably be identifiable as such only to a small number of people (unless they had somehow been publicly identified following the publication of the story, and I’ve heard no evidence of that). [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:07 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
It then undertook to replace every plank, beginning in a small section and working east and west in each direction as the work progressed. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:03 pm
  Might I suggest you take a look at Lundeen Coatings, Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
  Here it comes:  when the Supreme Court expressly rejected the stop-selling theory, “that statement was made in the context of the Bartlett case, where the drug was safe and effective for the vast majority of the people taking it, and ceasing to act would have benefitted only ‘the very small number’ of people who suffered an adverse reaction. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:07 am by Eric Goldman
The lawsuit focuses on Scribd’s “NetFlix-for-books” membership program, which allows subscribers to read ebooks from its library for a small monthly fee. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:41 am by Eric Goldman
Many other online services, large and small, use scraping to build their databases too. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:42 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer’s legal and management consulting work focuses on helping employers, insurers, employee benefit plans and their administrators, fiduciaries and advisors, community leaders and governments manage people, process and risk. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 6:36 am by Simon Fodden
Great-nephew, some people would say. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People v… [read post]