Search for: "Smith v Smith"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 14,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2011, 8:07 am
Adler) Bullcoming v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:24 am
Moreover, a building permit issued due to a misrepresentation by the applicant or an error by the municipal agency cannot confer rights in contravention of the zoning laws, and is subject to corrective action, even where the results may be harsh (see Matter of Parkview Assoc. v City of New York, 71 NY2d at 282; Town of Putnam Val. v Sacramone, 16 AD3d 669, 670; McGannon v Board of Trustees for Vil. of Pomona, 239 AD2d 392, 393; Baris Shoe Co. v Town of Oyster Bay,… [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:24 am
Moreover, a building permit issued due to a misrepresentation by the applicant or an error by the municipal agency cannot confer rights in contravention of the zoning laws, and is subject to corrective action, even where the results may be harsh (see Matter of Parkview Assoc. v City of New York, 71 NY2d at 282; Town of Putnam Val. v Sacramone, 16 AD3d 669, 670; McGannon v Board of Trustees for Vil. of Pomona, 239 AD2d 392, 393; Baris Shoe Co. v Town of Oyster Bay,… [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 4:06 am
Defendant relies heavily on Smith v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 10:48 am
Click here for more information on David Smith. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 7:33 am
Specifically, they comment on the case Hooper (Estate) v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
The securities fraud complaint in Nesbeth v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:04 pm
While United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:30 pm
Martyn Smith, the chief hand waver and obscurantist in Milward v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:22 pm
Smith v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:27 am
If passed, this bill (note: this is v.1, we are actually onto v.6 now) will impact you on a daily basis. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 11:23 am
Smith v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 10:29 pm
Smith, 2007 U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:43 pm
Under the test of Chevron v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 10:03 am
In Smith v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Smith [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Business v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 2:46 pm
Rev. 1071, 1104 (1994). [9] Warner-Jenkinson Co., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:20 pm
Ferguson Family Trust v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:57 am
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age has… [read post]
