Search for: "State v. Johnson" Results 4401 - 4420 of 8,027
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
” While the Eighth Circuit similarly upheld immunity based on the facts in Johnson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm by Bill Marler
While covering these events, my blog has been inundated with comments expressing outrage at FDA and state regulators for raw milk cheese “crackdowns. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 12:59 pm by Venkat
Johnson County CCSending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction -- State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 4:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The award is to provide compensation for lost wages, physical or mental problems caused by the incarceration, and pain and suffering, which can encompass the conditions of incarceration loss of freedom while imprisoned, separation from children, humiliation, interference with personal relationships and damage to reputation as held in Johnson v State of New York and McLaughlin v State of New York. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm by Amber Walsh
The MDMA has further stated that unless the tax is repealed, it will “stifle innovation, harm patient care, and weaken the position of the United States as the global leader in medical device innovation. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Yesterday’s oral arguments  in FCC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:23 am by Ken White
For an example of this complex balancing test in action, consider the district court case Johnson v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
Then, that was a panel discussion that additionally included Lord Justice Floyd (also sitting on the UPC Rules of Procedure Committee), Alan Johnson (Bristows), and Richard Vary (Nokia). [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
Ackerman explains the Amendment’s legitimacy on the basis of President Johnson’s 1868 capitulation to a non-Article-V process, confirmed by the Supreme Court in 1873. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 5:13 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Relying on United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 2:56 pm by Dave
The outcome of this battle may provide some insight into what powers states can bring to bear on patent trolls. [read post]