Search for: "University System v. State"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 8,143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2015, 3:53 pm
I think there are several good candidates for the best decision, including United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 7:54 pm
The defendants are the Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, The University of the State of New York, the Comptroller of the State of New York, and the Commissioner of Taxation and Finance of the State of New York. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
" The Court was not persuaded:A review of Iatric System confirms (1) that FairWarning responded (without requesting a hearing) to Iatric Systems's motion to dismiss, which challenged the '500 patent's validity, and (2) that the order dismissing the action both considered and rejected FairWarning's arguments.The Court then avoided the collateral estoppel question and ruled on the merits:Regardless of collateral estoppel, for the same reasons… [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:15 am
Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Lenz v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
In 2003 a bare five-person Court majority allowed the University of Michigan law school (in Grutter v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:35 am
Some might argue that Patent law and the systems which regulate it are just as complicated (and as confusing to the layman?) [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 11:55 am
(Interestingly, Kansas State University submitted an amicus brief on behalf of Yeasin, arguing that Title IX does not require universities to police off-campus conduct.) [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:58 pm
In the preamble to the final rule, the OFCCP noted public comment regarding the differing definitions in Directive 2013-03 (“Procedures for Reviewing Contractor Compensation Systems and Practices”) and the NPRM, and advocating for making them consistent. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:06 pm
The case arises from a challenge to the transfer of personal data from the EU (via Ireland) to the United States, which relied on a Commission Decision 2000/520 stating that the Safe Harbour system in place in the United States was ‘adequate’ as permitted by Article 25 Data Protection Directive. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:17 am
Porter v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:45 am
Practicing Law Institute – 2013 Igartúa de la Rosa v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:54 pm
” In Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
” Marya v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
In the House of Lords, the Chagos Islands case (R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] UKHL 61) because of the historical constitutional and international legal interest and its continuing ramifications which one follows both internationally and actually domestically. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:27 pm
See, e.g., Bank Melli Iran v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:01 am
Blog: Temas de propiedad intelectual Víctor M. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
But consider the context as the Justices will see it: the case comes from a state court system that has issued anti-arbitration rulings reversed in four previous cases (Concepcion, Preston v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 2:57 am
The result is a system of private governance running alongside the law without any of the human rights safeguards one normally expects of state-run systems, such as principles of accountability, predictability, accessibility, transparency and proportionality. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[v] Justice Anthony M. [read post]
