Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 4421 - 4440 of 11,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2015, 9:03 am by WIMS
The panel affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings the district court's judgment in an action challenging the United States Forest Service's decision to designate over two million acres of public land in the Beaverhead-DeerlodgeNational Forest for use by winter motorized vehicles.Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 3:49 am by Ben
 As it currently stands, the 2nd Circuit will be reviewing the New York judge's decision with the California case awaiting a result, too.More here http://the1709blog.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/1972-and-all-that-but-does-turtles-win.html and here http://the1709blog.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/turtles-probe-murky-soup-of-pre-1972-us.html and here Flo & Eddie, Inc., v Sirius XM Radio Inc., et al    UNITED… [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 10:55 am by Lyle Denniston
The case of Kingdomware Technologies, Inc., v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:12 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., involves Samantha Elauf, an individual who applied for a job at Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:49 am
 With this background, consider the following decision of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia (BC) in  Equustek Solutions Inc. v Google Inc., 2015 BCCA 265, released on 15 June 2015. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 9:04 am by WIMS
The panel affirmed the district court's holding that the United States Forest Service violated Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act when it failed to reinitiate consultation after the United States Fish and Wildlife Service designated critical habitat for the Canada lynx on National Forest land; affirmed the district court's denial of injunctive relief to Cottonwood Environmental Law Center; and remanded… [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm by Mack Sperling
The United States, its officers, and its agencies are not required to give security. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:50 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 784 F.3d 1335, 1341-45 (10th Cir. 2015)(finding no federal regulation that paralleled state common law claimsand further concluding that state law off-label promotion claim was preempted by § 360k); United States v. [read post]