Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE" Results 4421 - 4440 of 15,426
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2019, 8:04 pm by Adam Levitin
Professor Peter Conti-Brown of the Wharton School has written a short article for Brookings decrying the Second Circuit’s 2015 Madden v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm by Lev Sugarman
Editor’s Note: Below are the executive summaries of the two volumes of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's final report. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 7:06 pm by Patricia Salkin
Samar v Zoning Board of Upper Merion Township, 2019 WL 1749038 (PA Cmwlth 4/16/2019). [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Karen O’Connell, Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 6:43 am by Aurora Barnes
GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Some practitioners were surprised that Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 reached the country’s highest court. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Rick Pildes
  The flag-burning decision, Texas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  512(j) isn’t used b/c the relief is so narrow and b/c of the uncertainty over its application given what courts have done with other sections.Google’s site demotion has been helpful to authors to do massive takedowns, but it doesn’t address the problem when the users know the name of the site and can just type it in.Pariser: we may never get to STMs, but we should know factually what’s out there—that could help move the conversation so we won’t be… [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:52 pm by Simone Nash (Toronto)
Conversely, Australian courts have taken the opposite approach, and are increasingly categorizing directors’ duties as “public obligations” that carry an important social function. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:52 pm by Simone Nash (Toronto)
Conversely, Australian courts have taken the opposite approach, and are increasingly categorizing directors’ duties as “public obligations” that carry an important social function. [read post]