Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 4421 - 4440 of 29,830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2020, 2:17 pm by Michael Lowe
Co.,139 F.3d 561 (7th Cir.1998) (holding, under Maryland law, liability insurer had duty to defend Roman Catholic Diocese against allegations of parents that former priest abused their children, the court finding that the plaintiff’s alleged injuries were a kind of accidental occurrence); Silverball Amusement, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 10:49 am by Richard Hunt
Aug. 18, 2020) found that an accessible absentee voting system implemented by the defendants was sufficiently accessible to justify summary judgment for the defense. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Not a single member of the Court praised or defended the law at the oral argument or in the opinions. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm by Christine Corcos
He defended the interests of the church and promoted a wide variety of issues related to education. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm
He defended the interests of the church and promoted a wide variety of issues related to education. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 11:43 am by Brian L. Friedman
” To support their argument, the Insureds relied on dictionary definitions of “direct” as “[w]ithout intervening persons, conditions, or agencies; immediate;” and “physical” as pertaining to things “[o]f or pertaining to matter, or the world as perceived by the senses; material as [opposed] to mental or spiritual. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
., Nos. 17-2798-cv, 19-338, 19-404, 2020 WL 4743020, -- F.3d – (2d Cir. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Without comparative advertising, “injury to a particular competitor may be a small fraction of the defendant’s sales, profits, or advertising expenses. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” For example, an anti-paparazzi statute protecting citizens “from unreasonable intrusions on personal privacy,” could have the “collateral effect of precluding the defendant from exploiting a photograph that falls within the subject matter of federal copyright law” without preemption, and a ban on falsity could likewise interfere with the exploitation of literary works containing falsehoods. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 10:48 am by Jon Sands
Valencia-Mendoza, 912 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir. 2019). [read post]