Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 13,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
(b)(1).) [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:12 am
It should be noted that in this case, the demand (and indeed order sought) is for production of additional documents, not simply a listing of such documents: seeRules 7-1(1) (d), (e) and (f). [29] The court retains the discretion under Rule 7-1(14) to order that the party not produce the requested list or documents. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm
An Arkansas statute (Act 372) makes it a crime (in its section 1) for librarians and booksellers to "[f]urnish a harmful item to a minor. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
The Quebec Court of Appeal held that s. 3 of the SIA is a complete codification of state immunity and exceptions thereto: “[42] The Estate and some of the interveners invite us not to adopt the interpretation of s. 3(1) the SIA which the Court of Appeal for Ontario favoured in Bouzari v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:45 pm
But redistribution is really a placebo; it does nothing to raise real incomes and living standards of working people. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 1:37 pm
Sept. 29, 2010), a while ago, but we weren’t sure what to make of it. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 5:34 am
The Board’s RFI will seek information from interested parties on the following three questions: 1. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 6:56 am
See 29 C.F.R. [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:18 am
See 29 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
” 29 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 12:55 pm
(Jan. 29, 2016). [5] Douglas L. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:50 am
The 9th Circuit, in a 2-1 split, reversed.The crux of the court's decision hinged on two letters: so. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
The Second Circuit reasoned that “the existence of an ongoing business plan to develop the Haynesville Shale does not exempt the defendants from [the production in paying quantities] requirement. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
The Second Circuit reasoned that “the existence of an ongoing business plan to develop the Haynesville Shale does not exempt the defendants from [the production in paying quantities] requirement. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
The Second Circuit reasoned that “the existence of an ongoing business plan to develop the Haynesville Shale does not exempt the defendants from [the production in paying quantities] requirement. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
The Second Circuit reasoned that “the existence of an ongoing business plan to develop the Haynesville Shale does not exempt the defendants from [the production in paying quantities] requirement. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
On Monday, June 29, Chief Judge Colleen McMahon, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, issued a 37-page opinion which threw out a lawsuit filed by three landlords who alleged that New York State’s moratorium -- on evicting tenants facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the directive permitting tenants to have their landlords apply their security deposits to any outstanding rent -- was constitutionally… [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:48 pm
Question no. 2(a) If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative, does the fact that there has been an alteration as referred to in Question 1 have any bearing on the answer to the question whether exhaustion within the terms of Article 4(2) of the Copyright Directive is hindered or interrupted? [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
Since Fan Milk’s trade marks were for goods described in Class 29, 30 and 32 and Mandarin Oriental’s proposed mark was for services (not goods) described in Class 43 in Suit 791 and Class 36 in Suit 792, registration could not be rejected. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
On Monday, June 29, Chief Judge Colleen McMahon, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, issued a 37-page opinion which threw out a lawsuit filed by three landlords who alleged that New York State’s moratorium -- on evicting tenants facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the directive permitting tenants to have their landlords apply their security deposits to any outstanding rent -- was constitutionally… [read post]
