Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 5,814
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
P. 26(b)(2)(C)(i). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm
The matter had been reported on BBC national radio and local television news and had featured in Private Eye on several occasions during 2010. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
It is therefore the applicant who is entitled to file requests in grant proceedings before the EPO (see for example A 93(1)(b) (request for early publication), R 70(1) (request for examination) and R 71(4) (request for amendments)). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
The motion judge, Belobaba, J. disagreed and dismissed the defendants’ motion and held that the Ontario court had jurisdiction over the actions and Ontario was the convenient and appropriate forum. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:45 am
Nevertheless, based on this Court's judicial experience, Rule 12(b)(6) motions are seemingly filed as a matter of course in patent infringement lawsuits in this Court. . . . [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
This is in line with decisions T 842/90 and J 20/00 where it was considered possible that the payment of an additional fee amounting to [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:14 am
***William B. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:03 am
J. at 24, ECF No. 51-1. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 6:51 am
-Frank B. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 4:08 am
William J. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:46 pm
Words matter. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:49 am
Thomas Metier and Patrick J. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am
’ A defence will exist under clause 2 where the defendant shows that ‘(a) the statement complained of is, or forms part of, a statement on a matter of public interest; and (b) the defendant acted responsibly in publishing the statement complained of. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:09 am
Clause 2 places the burden of proof on the defendant to show two things: (a) that the statement complained of is, or forms part of, a statement on a matter of public interest”; and (b) that the defendant acted responsibly in publishing the statement complained of. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
As an auxiliary measure, it was requested that the following question be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA): a) If an authorisation is filed by facsimile, does the facsimile represent a copy in accordance with the Decision of the President [of the EPO dated 12 July 2007 on the filing of authorisations (OJ Special Edition 3/2007, L1, page 128)];b) If yes, is the EPO obliged in accordance with the Decision to inform the representative that an authorisation has not been… [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:33 pm
Judicial Notice — excerpts from Better Living Through Judicial Notice, by Paul J. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:10 pm
(b) Intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of human diseases. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
In this regard the Board points out that this wording of R 36(1) EPC is identical to the wording of the former R 25(1) EPC 1973 and, therefore, the corresponding case law can be taken into account.[6] The present Board agrees with the statement of the Legal Board of Appeal in decision J 18/04 that the term “pending earlier European patent application” in R 25 EPC 1973 did not establish a time limit having a point in time at which the pending status of an application begins and… [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:19 pm
(b) Any information concerning the fact or details of any sexual relationship between the Applicant and the person named in the Confidential Schedule to the Order….. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:38 pm
(b) Table of Contents- The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. [read post]
