Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 4421 - 4440 of 21,686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
The UK Supreme Court answered this question in the affirmative earlier this week in its judgment in R v M & Ors [2017] UKSC 58.Issued in the context of an interlocutory appeal in criminal proceedings, this ruling concerned the proper construction of section 92(1) of the UK Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:52 am by Marcel Pemsel
As trivial as these questions might appear, the answer can make or break your trade mark protection, as the recent General Court judgment in Wenz Kunststoff v EUIPO - Mouldpro (MOULDPRO) (case T-794/21) shows: Background On 6 June 2011, Wenz Kunststoff GmbH & Co. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 4:10 am
 Geisha registered Japonais with the State of Illinois, but never federally registered the mark. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:43 pm by Venkat
There have been a few cases in California where litigants continue to hash out causes of action under state spam statutes (see Hypertouch v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 1:16 pm by farrah nagrampa
Circuit erred in invalidating an EPA rule that implemented limits on cross-state air pollution, and Schuette v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
EU General Court explains how the relevant assessment is to be undertaken | High Court employs ‘intention to target’ approach to determine application of EU/UK law in online trade mark infringement case | There's a new IPO report on designs infringement - game-changer or stating the obvious? [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:20 am by Farrah Nagrampa
  Every year, the first Monday in October marks the beginning of a new term. [read post]