Search for: "Samsung"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 6,711
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2012, 4:03 pm
: Check, Please: Experts Say Apple, Samsung Face Sky-High Legal Fees, Samsung Violated Apple Patents, Jury Rules, Apple’s $1B Patent Victory Could Help Company Corner the Market, Jury Hands Apple $1B Victory Over Samsung in Epic Patent Trial, Samsung Ordered to Pay Apple $1 Billion for Patent Violations). [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 1:05 pm
Apple-Samsung Case Shows Smartphone as Lawsuit Magnet – NYTimes.com. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 1:01 pm
Apple’s $1 Billion Verdict May Lead to Samsung Sales Ban – Bloomberg. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 9:20 am
Because the jury found that Samsung willfully infringed on Samsung’s patents (as opposed to inadvertently), the judge has the discretion to increase the jury’s award up to triple that amount. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 9:20 am
Samsung will likely appeal the decision once the judge decides the final damages. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 9:12 am
The jury found that Samsung infringed on a series of Apple’s patents on mobile devices, awarding Apple more than $1 billion in damages. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 8:30 am
[JURIST] A jury in the US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website] ruled [verdict form, PDF] Friday that Samsung Electronics [corporate website] violated several smartphone and tablet technology related patents held by Apple [corporate website], awarding $1.05 billion in damages. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 8:18 am
The jury found that Samsung infringed six out of the seven patents at issue, and that Apple didn’t violate any of Samsung’s five patents at issue in the case. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 8:00 am
We presume that everyone reading this blog is by now aware that the jury considering the patent dispute between Apple and Samsung in California reached its verdict on Friday, finding strongly in favour of Apple on numerous counts, and awarding total damages of just over $1 billion against Samsung. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 7:39 am
The general consensus was that Apple really won the initial round and that Samsung held its own during the case and gave a powerful closing. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 7:29 am
I haven't got a clue what the Apple Samsung jury was thinking, when they decided that Samsung's phones infringed the iPhone design patents; but that the Samsung tablets didn't infringe the iPad design patents. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 2:36 am
My Samsung products still work, and I am keeping them. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Samsung hailed the decision. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 2:01 am
So no bans on Samsung devices in China, at least not for the moment. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 12:11 am
Samsung Now Just as Boring as Other Patent Cases Samsung’s U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 11:58 pm
The Korean court ordered Apple to pay Samsung $35,000 and Samsung to pay Apple $22,000.See: Samsung to fight court ruling in Apple patent dispute [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:08 pm
TweetApple won huge today in its patent battle with Samsung over smartphones (Wired). [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:48 pm
Samsung jury verdict I just published and commented on, the key issues for the court to address will bewhether the jury must be overruled in some ways (as a matter of law), which is especially what Samsung wants;whether any (and if so, which) parts of the damages figure must be tripled because of Samsung's willful infringement; andwhether Apple will be granted a preliminary injunction barring Samsung from the sale of infringing products in the United States… [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:12 pm
The jury has also rejected Samsung's countersuit – finding the Samsung patents not-infringed. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:44 pm
Samsung had countersued for $421 million, but received nothing. [read post]
