Search for: "State v. Files" Results 4421 - 4440 of 91,552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2010, 6:20 am by Record on Appeal
  The court recognized prior Hawaii case law (Winslow v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 5:56 pm by Bryn Miller
MARTIN SAN FRANCISCO, December 16 – Today, the United States Supreme Court declined to review City of Boise v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:20 pm by Unknown
Bailey Tool & Manufacturing (5th Cir. 3/10/14), plaintiff originally filed suit in state court alleging only violations of the Texas anti-discrimination statute. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:20 pm by Michael Fox
Bailey Tool & Manufacturing (5th Cir. 3/10/14), plaintiff originally filed suit in state court alleging only violations of the Texas anti-discrimination statute. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:44 pm by Ronald Mann
” The court noted that “[d]etermining the limits on the sovereign immunity held by Indian tribes is a grave question; … and the alternative argument for affirmance did not emerge until late in this case, … only when the United States filed an amicus brief. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 7:43 am by Gene Quinn
Recently, a group of amici led by Eli Lilly filed an amici curiae brief with the United States Supreme Court in the matter of Sequenom, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 1:56 pm
Section 10 states clearly that “all Potential Actions arising under U.S. law relating to patent infringement or invalidity, and filed within two (2) years of the end of the Covenant Term, shall be filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:00 am by Brian Price
  The Superior Court follows the reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit in State Farm v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
On July 13, 2007, New York County Lawyers' Association (NYCLA) filed its amicus curiae brief with the United States Supreme Court in the matter of New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
The state had previously filed a compliant brief that covered many of the same points, but we ordered replacement briefs in light of Daire v. [read post]