Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 4421 - 4440
of 29,674
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2019, 1:58 pm
The United State Supreme Court issued a recent decision – Stokeling v. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 5:02 pm
It's just that Judge Christen continues to use the word "animus" in her description of the underlying mental state, and that word is typically used to describe a particular mental state that doesn't always exist in her chosen definition.)I'll go even further. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
Rose v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:22 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of TexasOpinion Date: 5/11/09Cite: Courtoom Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 4:26 am
United States, here; United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:12 pm
See, e.g., Dyna-Med, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Perry & US v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 9:54 am
In Exide Technologies v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:45 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:45 pm
Weisler & State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:29 am
As Judge Teresa Liston said in State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 4:39 pm
Moody v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:22 am
In the case of Shehla Zia v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 9:07 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:35 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:30 am
They carefully considered the historical context of the decision in Wilkinson v Downton. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:59 pm
In Brown, the Court held that that California’s state law limiting the sale of violent video games violated the First Amendment and affirmed an injunction against any enforcement of the law. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:59 pm
In Brown, the Court held that that California’s state law limiting the sale of violent video games violated the First Amendment and affirmed an injunction against any enforcement of the law. [read post]
