Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 6,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2020, 11:09 am
” The Hernandez family’s case implicates foreign relations, the court reasoned, because of the “legitimate and important interests” of both the United States and Mexico “that may be affected by the way in which this matter is handled. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:35 pm
Gore, Citizens United, and NFIB -- and perhaps Fisher v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:12 pm
In Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom the government boldly sought and failed to reverse the decision of the court’s Grand Chamber in Hirst No. 2. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 6:23 am
United States as an example of the potential balance between "textualist" judicial analyses and those that are more "structural and prudential. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 7:04 am
In response, Charles filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:51 am
Especially since like most contracts, there is a strong likelihood that if you end up litigating a Creative Commons brand license in the United States it will be enforced. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:31 am
” Commentary on the Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 10:25 pm
Given the history of Indian law in the United States, it's not an inconsequential argument to make (and hardly "frivolous"). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:10 am
Silver of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona denied a motion to exclude evidence of the patent reexamination of the ’894 patent-in-suit in Integrated Technology Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:27 am
That said, the book ends strong. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:40 am
, 466 US 485 (1984); and United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 7:27 pm
DePyper v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:32 am
United States and NFIB v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:22 pm
Kaersvang: Marbury v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 11:16 am
This ongoing, thoughtful process contributed not only to the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision striking down Section 3 of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:11 am
., v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
He served as Missouri state director for Sen. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 10:35 am
Applicable to medical malpractice cases, that act, which restricted contingency fees and imposed a $250,000 hard cap on noneconomic damages, started the United States down the path of legislative tort reform—a reform movement that has dramatically altered the tort system’s operation, generosity and capacity—and that is still going strong well into its fourth decade. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Besides the student loan case, take United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
The Federal Court relied on Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
