Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 15,008
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
The Home Office rejected the request, stating that it is not in the public interest to disclose any of the requested information. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 1:51 pm
§ 3553(a) and United States v Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a further reduction generally would not be appropriate. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 9:03 am
Schaffer v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
The case decided this week is Moore v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 9:28 am
Medical studies published as early as the 1920? [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:46 am
However, proponents of less video game regulation point to the studies that have shown video games can improve cognitive skills. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 3:47 am
In its opinion denying certification in Mullis v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:27 am
July 24, 2015); and most recently, Stevens v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:52 am
Garske (United States)III.C Views of Law and the Cities· The Interaction between Non-Judicial Mechanisms of Conflict Resolution and the State: the Case Study of Maputo, Concetta Tina Lorizzo, University of Cape Town (South Africa)· Plurality and the City, Julian Sidoli del Ceno, Birmingham City University (United… [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Yates v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
First, a lead agency can reasonably conclude that a project which exceeds state energy efficiency standards has a less than significant impact. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 10:19 am
In TPG Technology Consulting Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
In 2012, the case of Louboutin v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 2:27 pm
Supreme Court to reverse the denial of summary judgment in the case of Scott v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
A week ago today, I sat in the gallery of the United States Supreme Court with twenty North Carolina district court judges listening to Chief Justice John Roberts announce the court’s opinion in Endrow v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:16 am
especially a nice dinnerTo be protected a belief must relate to matters which a more than merely trivial, possess an adequate degree of seriousness and it must be a belief on a fundamental problem (R (Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education, paragraph 23), although the belief does not need to govern the entirety of a person’s life (Grainger v Nicholson, paragraph 27).In the initial Employment Tribunal decision in Gray, the Tribunal did not accept that Ms… [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:24 pm
Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003); Grutter v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:50 am
NetChoice and NetChoice v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 2:09 am
& State Univ., to L.R. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
