Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 6,214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2012, 8:08 am
Paul Luvera provides a good "cost v. benefits" sample cross examination. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:08 am
Paul Luvera provides a good "cost v. benefits" sample cross examination. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:51 am
Kmart Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 6:23 am
In the notorious PLIVA v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
In Huras v Primerica Financial Services Limited[13]an agreement on settlement was reached which provided small compensation to each member of the large group of class members.[14] The settlement provided for additional compensation to be paid to the Ontario and British Columbia RPs – $3000 and $2000 respectively.[15] By way of contract, in Sutherland, Justice Winkler disallowed a claim where the RP sought compensation for work related to the administration of the… [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:54 am
In Roderick v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:36 am
A closer look While Schmitz reveled in the attention, it wasn’t long before TÜV was wondering what, exactly, it had bought. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 11:49 am
On January 24th, the Court of Appeals approved its November 2011 decision in People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:44 am
Wade, Gilbert v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:41 pm
S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:59 am
(Orin Kerr) In its opinion below in what became United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
As we approach the 38th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star… [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Why this is working in this way is perfectly summed up in this decision out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Curtis v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:10 am
” Of course, he admits that his cross-cutting considerations are “competing” and therefore difficult to satisfy. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:45 am
Second, despite the often-shaky reliability of eyewitness identifications and the opportunity of defense lawyers to expose flaws through cross-examination in court, juries place disproportionate faith in the IDs anyway. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 11:33 pm
Three needed to be transferred to Whipps Cross hospital for specialist hyperbaric treatment. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:24 am
She calls attention to U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:11 am
is a post from the law firm marketing blog, Lawyerist.com Related posts: Facebook Page v. [read post]
