Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK"
Results 4421 - 4440
of 7,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2013, 12:40 pm
Posner, sitting at the time by designation on the United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois, handed down his final ruling on the case, I predicted that the FRAND-related part of the decision -- Judge Posner limited the availability of injunctive relief to a scenario in which Apple would refuse to pay a FRAND royalty -- was going to be more influential going forward than the decisions he made with respect to three Apple patents. [read post]
8 May 2016, 6:24 pm
The usurpation of contract law by patent law is the subject of my 2014 article in the Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 11:33 am
Andrei Iancu, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 11:04 am
Patent and Trademark Offices is also considering this issue. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:21 am
She then served in the Office of the General Counsel of the United States International Trade Commission working on Section 337 matters, arguing before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
Lee, No. 15-716 (Can the Patent and Trademark Office appropriately apply the “broadest reasonable interpretation” standard in construing patent claims in post-grant validity challenges?) [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:03 pm
International Trade Commission, where a positive verdict would ban the infringing technology from being imported to the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:03 pm
International Trade Commission, where a positive verdict would ban the infringing technology from being imported to the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
In other words, an identical act of infringement would yield two different damages awards simply because the infringers packaged their products in different units. [read post]
3 May 2018, 12:07 pm
It may very well be that today's United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is more balanced than the Federal Court of Justice of Germany. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:35 am
” – Dennis = = = = = To Members of the United States Congress: We, the undersigned, are economics and legal scholars who study innovation, intellectual property law, and policy. [read post]
11 May 2023, 10:00 am
After the dismissal, Pure Hemp moved for attorney fees, stating two bases for relief: “(1) UCANN’s prosecution counsel had allegedly committed inequitable conduct by copying text from a piece of prior art” and did not disclose the prior art to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and “(2) UCANN’s litigation counsel … purportedly took conflicting positions in its representation of UCANN… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:32 am
The decision to grant cert. comes only days after the United States Patent and Trademark Office refused to grant reexamination of the patent in question. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 2:59 am
Trademark Fee Reduction: In a notice in the Federal Register on December 16th (here), the USPTO announced that certain trademark fees will be reduced as of January 15, 2015. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 6:57 am
Rogers, Chief Administrative Trademark Judge, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria Hon. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:53 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:47 pm
While Ericsson and Apple easily agreed upon David Folsom, former Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, as their mediator, the dispute isn't ripe for settlement. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:28 am
Patent No. 7,469,381 on "list scrolling and document translation, scaling, and rotation on a touch-screen display", which has won Apple several court rulings literally around the globe (most recently in Japan) and is one of the six Apple patents a jury last summer found infringed by Samsung.A month ago the United States Patent and Trademark Office gave notice of its intent to issue a reexamination certificate confirming, among others,… [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 8:07 am
That has not happened.See also Slashgear's USPTO invalidates Apple design patent used against SamsungSee also Billboard's Patent Office Invalidates iPhone Design Used in Samsung CaseMacRumors cites FossPatents:FOSS Patents reported tonight that the Central Reexamination Division of the United States Patent and Trademark Office has reexamined one of the key iPhone design patents in the Apple vs. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 1:28 pm
Over at PATENTLYO, Dennis Crouch blogs about the non-precedential decision In re Chudik, issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which involved whether a functional limitation contained in a claim can be found in the prior art. [read post]
