Search for: "V D" Results 4421 - 4440 of 76,309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Bruen is quite simply a national nightmare.In United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:33 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  Sec. 286.31(3)(d) says that every filing must include the name of "[t]he individual or entity that compensated the blogger for the blog post," the amount of the compensation, the date of the blog post (and the dates of any other blog posts in the same "series"), and the "website and website address where the blog post can be found. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 12:00 pm by Gary Corn, Melanie Teplinsky
Entitled “Combating Ransomware: One Year On,” the paper was drafted in consultation with leading experts in the field: V. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:40 am by Neil Wilkof
Recognising the uncertainty arising from the issue of whether acquired distinctiveness may be considered at the mark-similarity inquiry, PAR Lim “decline[d] to wade into the controversy”.Both Twitter and V V submitted extensive arguments on appeal and Goh JC considered this issue at length. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
Because if you think that same-sex marriage is obviously right, you’d be in a minority – at least if you consider everyone in the world, and all the people throughout history. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Good morning and thank you, [Columbia Law School] Dean [Gillian] Lester, for the introduction. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:59 pm
    This morning, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Shields v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 2:04 pm by Aaron Moss
The copyright owner in Runt is seeking to enjoin director William Coakley from releasing a behind-the-scenes project about alleged on-set bullying and sexual harassment that it claims he fabricated. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 11:24 am
I'd think that the public would legitimately want to know that, and that the disclosure of that fact outside of Twitter employees themselves wouldn't harm national security pretty much at all, much less at a level that authorizes a prior restraint.But what do I know? [read post]