Search for: "F. v. F." Results 4441 - 4460 of 57,905
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Gorewitz, 132 F. 2d. 23 (DC Cir. 1942), which came to my attention through Alisha Jarwala, “The More Things Change: Hundley v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Or, la preuve prépondérante des circonstances de l’interpellation de cet homme permet de conclure que la couleur de sa peau et le fait qu’il conduisait un véhicule de luxe ont joué, de façon inconsciente, dans la décision des agentes d’intercepter son véhicule. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 8:30 am by Russell Knight
“[F]raud will not be presumed in this State and must be proved by clear and convincing evidence” Hofmann v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Brown, Alex Engler, and Henry Claypool to discuss how people with disabilities are impacted by current technology and legislation on this issue: Loren DeJonge Schulman discussed Schedule F, a Trump administration federal workforce policy, and its potential implications on national security. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:48 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Amgen, 580 F.3d at 1365–67; Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
”] From today's opinion by Judge Gregory Woods in Flynn v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:24 am by Ashley Morgan
Amniotic Fluid / Amniotic Membrane Tissue Audits, Investigations and Prosecutions are Continuing to Climb in 2022 (August 4, 2022): Over the past year, we have seen a significant increase in the number of Medicare administrative audits, False Claims Act investigations and criminal prosecutions by the Department of Justice (DOJ), related to the billing of allogeneic (harvested from someone else) stem cell products. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 11:52 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Omnicom, 497 F.3d 124, 128 (2d Cir. 2007) (internal citation omitted), a motion to set aside a settlement agreement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3) “cannot be granted absent clear and convincing evidence of material misrepresentations,”Smith v. [read post]