Search for: "German v. German"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 5,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2020, 9:58 am
Maffick v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 9:39 am
On May 20, 2013, a young government contractor with an EFF sticker on his laptop disembarked a plane in Hong Kong carrying with him evidence confirming, among other things, that the United States government had been conducting mass surveillance on a global scale. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Avoids problems of regulatory arbitrage. 230 v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
In Dugal v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
(Class 46) German Federal Patent Court: Registrability of labels (Etikett) (Class 46) India Indian “Bayh Dole” and parliamentary committee hearings (Spicy IP) Israel Israel to be downgraded on Special 301 List? [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:04 am
’ The German Bundesgerichtshof holds a similar reasoning in Sisvel v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
CAN SPAM: This Infographic Says It All http://t.co/h7TOQEeSZ7 -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-07-02: Geophysical Service v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:06 am
Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In Trump v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm
(Kenneth Anderson) I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
A v Cornwall Council [2017] EWHC 842 (QB). [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
This includes paragraphs 18, 19, 63-67, and 69, which are directly germane to the plaintiff's theory of the case. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:06 pm
IndiaHillson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 4:47 pm
ArgentinaMajul v. [read post]
20 May 2023, 3:07 am
Yezhov and Others v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 6:50 am
The noteworthy fact in this part of the case was that one of the inventors was an employee under German employment law, which provides an employee with the right to claim a service invention, i.e. created in the course of employment. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Hearn v. [read post]
