Search for: "In Re: Does v." Results 4441 - 4460 of 30,602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2015, 12:45 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
• The invention claimed in the ’350 patent is a covered business method patent as that term is understood, and it does not fall within the meaning of a “technological in-vention. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
That basic requirement does not embody a substantive standard of care, but rather an administrative requirement aimed at furthering the FDCA's regulatory goals.2009 WL 250478, at *4 (footnote omitted) (citing Talley v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The fruition of that absorption of DP law into Article 8 is apparent in the recent decision of Catt v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:38 am by Florian Mueller
And I can see that those who would like Apple to "destroy" (as Steve Jobs put it) Android in court (for which Apple's own customers would also pay the price) increasingly realize that Apple does not appear to be, if the results of more than four years of litigation are any indication, a nuclear world power.I did want to add a few general thoughts. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 2:26 pm by Howard Knopf
The idea is that the cost of re-wrapping or covering over the copyrighted artwork would act as a major disincentive... [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In re Spalding Sports World- wide, Inc., 203 F.3d 800 (Fed. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In re Spalding Sports World- wide, Inc., 203 F.3d 800 (Fed. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 9:40 am by Uthman Law Office
However, it agreed with  Lopez and Munoz that the petitioning process for re-sentencing added in section 1170.95 does not apply to attempted murder. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:18 am by Amy Howe
  She concludes that, if the government does not prevail in Bond v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  Sometimes it does. [read post]