Search for: "Matter of Thomas" Results 4441 - 4460 of 11,347
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
Moreover, they have rejected the government’s assertion that federal courts lack jurisdiction to rule on such matters. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:03 am by John Jascob
By Lene Powell, J.D.The Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed an action alleging that a company director breached his fiduciary duty in a merger, ruling that although the statute of limitations had not expired, the action was barred by laches as a matter of equity. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:41 am by Michael Risch
First, as a general matter, I'm always wary of studies that equate patenting with R&D. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 5:17 am
According to the USPTO Chief Data Strategist Thomas Beach, these data have been brought to the public by “leveraging emerging technologies such as big data and machine learning”. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The Court departed from earlier caselaw on the matter, which had viewed as irrelevant a person’s knowledge with respect to liability for trade mark infringement.. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:47 pm by WIMS
      In a 5-4 decision in which Justices Alito, Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas were the majority and Kagan, Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayor dissented, the majority ruled to overturn the Florida Supreme Court ruling. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 9:20 am by Sandy Levinson
Don't get me wrong:  I think it is fine to "follow precedent" in matters that aren't of much importance. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 5:40 pm by Mark Graber
  For that matter, if we understand why Republicans placed antislavery commitments above political reform, can we understand why many Republicans today are willing to hold their nose and support Donald Trump as long as they think his policies are better than the Democratic alternative. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:49 am by Eugene Volokh
Applying antidiscrimination laws to a baker simply because he violated those laws, the Court said, might be constitutional (depending on whether that violates the Free Speech Clause, a matter on which the majority did not opine). [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:30 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The judgment of the Court of Appeals isreversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.Justice Thomas and Justice Scalia were on opposite sides of the vote. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 12:19 pm by David Markus
One interesting thing was Justice Thomas’s animation. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:00 pm by Claire Mitchell
” Many, including the plaintiffs, were surprised by this order based on the fact that, more recently, judges handling similar cases in California have refused to apply the primary jurisdiction doctrine to dismiss or stay matters. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 3:28 am
In re Elisabeth Stecki DBA Whineware, Serial No. 87215481 (January 24, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]