Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 4,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 7:09 am
The CAT’s recent decision in YCC 435 v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:08 am
In Canada v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 4:23 am
Cellular standards are implemented at the hardware level, not in Android itself. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
It was introduced into US state law nearly 30 years ago and the first execution by this method was in 1982. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
This system empowers firms to precisely assess and assign value to projects, vital in a landscape where AI/efficiency gains drastically shorten task timelines. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:17 am
Porter v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:14 pm
It's strange that the stories all described the key standards for what type of request will trigger a takedown in totally vague terms. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
The use of Rule 1.8.5 raises other concerns. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:58 pm
Here's an excerpt from the opinion, NRA v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:59 am
§115(d)(3)(E)(i)] The database shall include the title of the work, the copyright owner(s) and ownership percentage(s), contact information for the copyright owner (if known), and “to the extent reasonably available,” “the international standard musical work code” for the work, and “identifying information for sound recordings in which the musical work is embodied,” including titles, featured artists, sound recording copyright owners,… [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:43 pm
If you have an announcement to add to the page, email us. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
We shared with the world in advance what we knew Putin was planning and precisely how he would try to falsely justify his aggression. [read post]
18 May 2020, 1:52 pm
” In other words, Frampton writes, Rule 48 “was drafted and enacted precisely to deal with the situation that has arisen in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
” However, merely making such boastful statements does not make them true, nor mean that useful performance metrics for courts do not exist. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:31 am
This is a revised edition of my February 2014 post, which was published immediately after the CJEU's Svensson decision on copyright and linking. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:31 am
This is a revised edition of my February 2014 post, which was published immediately after the CJEU's Svensson decision on copyright and linking. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:31 am
This is a revised edition of my February 2014 post, which was published immediately after the CJEU's Svensson decision on copyright and linking. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 11:32 am
(That delegation and Cuccinelli’s continued, unlawful use of the acting deputy secretary title would take an entire separate post.) [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
Circuit’s recent decision in Comcast v. [read post]
