Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 6,122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am
" Section 11 deals with third party information and sub-section (1) thereof is extracted below: "(1) Where a Central Public Information Officer or a State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, intends to disclose any information or record, or part thereof on a request made under this Act, which relates to or has been supplied by a third party and has been treated as confidential by that third party, the Central Public Information Officer or State… [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 9:50 am
(Para 39-40, Settlement of commercial disputes: Revision of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules A/CN.9/WGII/WP.143/Add.1). [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:41 am
In a recent domain name dispute decision, Party Booths, LLC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:50 am
As was stated inGiles v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:02 pm
§ 112, ¶ 2. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 7:32 am
Cansulex Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:46 pm
” J.A. 847, ¶ 2. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:52 am
Wilson, 2007 BCCA 622 at para. 109: “Material contribution”, as that phrase was used in Athey v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:55 am
Third Amended Complaint ¶ ¶ 12-25. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:21 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 1:53 pm
The City of Newkirk, Oklahoma, 2011-2 Trade Cases ¶77,550. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:52 am
§§ 4651–4660–A (2010), against the landlord of that building, see Blackhouse v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:21 am
(I say 'rightly or wrongly', because the central holding of those cases was not as broad as many thought at the time: see Jones v Ministry of the Interior of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2006] UKHL 26, [2007] 1 AC 270, paras 86 et seq). [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:02 am
See Ugas v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am
(RES) TZ 2 SP33 2011 Civil Rights With all deliberate speed : implementing Brown v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 8:01 pm
The above aspect was dealt with elaborately in paras 38, 40 and 44. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 1:10 pm
., Delhi v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:30 am
Thomas Estate (1985), 19 D.L.R. (4th) 594 (B.C.C.A.) at para. 47 and the reference therein to the speech of Viscount Cave in Donald Campbell & Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:11 am
The letter agreement further stated that [**3] defendant would not file a notice of appearance until he had received a total sum of $35,000.00 (id.). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:04 am
Rennie, 2010 BCSC 625 at para. [read post]
