Search for: "Roll v. Roll" Results 4441 - 4460 of 6,810
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
”    The opinion then gets rolling into the background of the statute. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Cases addressing whether older entertainment industry contracts granted rights for new uses such player piano rolls, radio, motion pictures, television and videocassettes are plentiful. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Cases addressing whether older entertainment industry contracts granted rights for new uses such player piano rolls, radio, motion pictures, television and videocassettes are plentiful. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Cases addressing whether older entertainment industry contracts granted rights for new uses such player piano rolls, radio, motion pictures, television and videocassettes are plentiful. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:07 am by INFORRM
In the Courts On 12 April 2011, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Leveson and Pitchford LJJ) gave judgment in the remarkable case of Ambrosiadou v Coward ([2011] EWCA Civ 409). [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm by Ilya Somin
They are clearly on a roll when it comes to winning property rights cases at SCOTUS! [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
That fact is reflected in this week’s unusually long roll of relists, which are plentiful enough that it appears that the court may have simply rolled over the entire “discuss list” from last week’s conference. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Associated Newspapers Limited v Duchess of Sussex, heard 9-11 November 2021 (The Master of the Rolls, The President of the Queen’s Bench Division and Bean LJ) GUH v KYT, heard on 28 October 2021 (Collins Rice J) Soriano v Forensic News, heard 6 and 7 October 2021 (Sharp P, Elisabeth Laing and Warby LJ) Qatar Airways Group Q.S.C.S v Middle East News UK Limited and others heard on 4 October 2021 (Saini J) Abramovich… [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:01 pm by Giles Peaker
To save unnecessary tension, and quite remarkably, the result was that the Right to Rent Scheme was declared incompatible with Art 8 and Art 14, and any further roll out of the Scheme without significant review and revision was not to take place. [read post]