Search for: "State v. Bias"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 4,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2007, 9:00 pm
The decision of Prakash and Singh v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
” Discerning what speech rules are “topic-based” or “category-based” and which ones import impermissible viewpoint bias sounds like fodder for endless litigation and disagreement. [read post]
21 May 2025, 4:00 am
As Gavin MacKenzie has stated: The requirement that applicants be of good character is preventative, not punitive. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:17 am
John DonohueIn my view, Justice Scalia blundered badly last week in his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:46 am
Secretary of State) visit to Calgary on May 13, 2009; Michael Chertoff's (former U.S. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm
For the reasons outlined above in my analysis of Grant v Todorovic (supra) I do not feel that this is such a case. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:00 pm
There are 26 federative states (and the federal district) in Brazil, each of which have the powers to adopt their own Constitutions and laws, subject to the rules and principles provided for under the Federal Constitution. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 9:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 12:19 pm
The perceived need for this amendment arose following the decision of the Supreme Court in Maguire v Ardagh [2002] 1 IR 385, colloquially known as the Abbeylara decision. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 11:07 am
But I fear that the arguments, no matter how eloquently stated, are unlikely to move the political system in any fun [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
The Statement explicitly states that those journal submissions which fail to conform to the virulently anti-Israel political viewpoints of the Board and Staff Editors will be summarily rejected. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
For instance, the use of generative AI in court settings raises concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential bias in the algorithms used. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
Possibly it serves to bring this notion into relief to state it in algebraic terms: if the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B less than PL.United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
After examining the bias in several meta-analyses from excluding zero-event trials, Friedrich and colleagu [read post]
3 Nov 2024, 4:22 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 7:28 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm
Yet, the EU standard for legal anonymisation is still hotly debated, as illustrated by the recent case of SRB v EDPS now under appeal before the Court of Justice. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
We are stuck in a perpetual state of betwixt and between, a kind of innovation limbo. [read post]
