Search for: "State v. Gathers"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 5,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2014, 1:04 am
” In June this year the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that Mr Klinger was fr [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO upholds one of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF’s) human stem cell patents (decisions are pending on two other patents): (IPKat), (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), English High Court rules Qualcomm’s patents invalid in battle against Nokia: (Philip Brooks), (IPEG), (IP… [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:31 pm
No Intention to Expand or Contract Existing Authority The amended version does have new language expressly stating that the section should not be read to expand or limit “the authority of the President or the scope of the Authorization for Use of Military Force. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 3:39 am
In the case of Hernandez v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 8:27 am
The case is Banks v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 3:46 am
Remember Buck v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 6:06 am
Bush v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:17 am
The Court has this morning issued its decision in Brüstle v Greenpeace (C-34/10). [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 1:37 pm
The case that laid the foundation for PFAS litigation was Leach v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:39 am
Managed Care Advisory Group v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 2:20 pm
The IPKat's excellent and scholarly friend Norman Siebrasse tells him that he has recently become aware of a recent Canadian decision, Nazerali v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:07 pm
The Commission defers these issues to an expert group which it will set up to gather industry practices, although without committing to providing further guidance in this area. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 9:00 pm
’”Thus, in Lockett v. [read post]
The Office of Legal Counsel Discloses Classified List of Opinions in Important Step for Transparency
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 am
The case that led to the production of these documents, Francis v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm
This week also brought ‘Fisting’ to the fore on twitter: Obscenity trial – the law is not suitable for a digital age Myles Jackman in the Guardian: “I welcome the jury’s verdict but the OPA means the state is still capable of acting as a voyeur in the bedroom” I need not trouble you with the facts of R v Peacock. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:35 pm
Supreme Court guaranteed free lawyers for all felony defendants who could not afford legal representation in the landmark case of Gideon v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 11:44 am
The CFPB’s counsel also argued that the Ninth Circuit should follow its decision in CFPB v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 11:10 am
Like advertising in general in Canada, material terms in a destination marketing promotion (e.g., restrictions on prize awards) should be clearly stated upfront. [read post]
