Search for: "State v. Laws" Results 4441 - 4460 of 156,354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
United States and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (used with permission, www.courtartist.com) How should citizens in a republic bound by the rule of law regard the pretextual use of law by state officials? [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 7:32 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, February 22, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:33 pm
Conflict of laws: Forum non conveniens: Choice of law: Injunction:Chick Kam Choo v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:38 pm by H. Scott Leviant
On Wednesday, February 20, 2019, the United States Supreme Court held, in Timbs v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 11:17 am
Last summer, we blogged about Kamakahi v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 11:17 am
Last summer, we blogged about Kamakahi v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:55 am
Employees of a state as an employer may not sue their employer for alleged violation of the ADEA or similar acts of CongressKimel v Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 Section 58 of the Civil Service Law sets out minimum and maximum age qualifications for initial appointment as a police officer by political subdivisions of New York State other than the City of New York. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
In other words, the Second Amendment applies to state and local governments. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:09 am by Phil Dixon
North Carolina adopted Whren under the state constitution in State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 5:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Reeves (Employment Law; Exhaustion of Tribal Court Remedies)State of Kansas v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:03 am by Gregory Forman
To the surprise of no one who has been paying attention, the June 26, 2013 United States Supreme Court opinions in the cases of United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 3:58 am
Long (University of Connecticut School of Law) has posted Demosprudence, Interactive Federalism, and Twenty Years of Sheff V. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 4:15 pm by Jacek Stramski
Delva contended that the legislature intended pregnancy discrimination as a viable action under state law after the adoption of the PDA, evident by the reenactment of the FCRA following O’Loughlin v. [read post]