Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2011, 6:59 pm
Lesniak v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 1:24 pm
The Supreme Court heard the landmark appeal, Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023], after it was initially dismissed in the High Court and Court of Appeal in 2021. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:32 pm
SEC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:32 pm
SEC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:31 am
United States of America v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:01 am
Little Hare Gin had not provided any evidence of use in the marketplace or stated whether these brands had registered their marks. [read post]
8 May 2022, 1:43 am
Following a hearing, the Hearing Officer issued decisions upholding the objections.In her decisions (BLO/629/21 and BLO/630/21), the Hearing Officer relied on Case T-795/17 Moreira v EUIPO (NEYMAR), stating that— 'bad faith may be assumed in the event of the lack of a proper explanation by the applicant to rebut certain known facts, which in turn led to inescapable motivations on the part of the applicant and as far as the filing of the trade mark application… [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 8:15 am
Supreme Court ruled in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Otherwise, the Supreme Court wrote in its 1992 case Quill Corp. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:57 am
ShareWednesday’s argument in Vidal v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 6:38 am
” (Monasky v Taglieri, 589 US —, —, 140 S Ct 719, 727 [2020] [internal quotation marks omitted].) [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am
At the Associated Press, Mark Sherman reports on National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 1:45 pm
Finally, Don Thompson of the AP reports here that the California senate approved a bill that would change the state's sentencing scheme in the wake of the Court's ruling in Cunningham v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 9:43 am
" Hilton registered the trade mark "that's hot" with the USTPO.The 9th Circuit dismissed the trade mark infringement claim, which Hilton did not appeal, but accepted that Hilton could still argue that the card misappropriated her likeness in the image. [read post]
23 May 2025, 6:30 am
Uyeda At the 12th Annual Conference on Financial Market Regulation Posted by Mark T. [read post]
23 May 2025, 6:30 am
Uyeda At the 12th Annual Conference on Financial Market Regulation Posted by Mark T. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Still, the two constructs were the tools they had to get themselves there, and they had to be used in certain ways or else appear to pass–in Mark’s words–”from lawyerly deliberation to sheer willfulness” (to quote Mark’s rendering of Harlan Fiske Stone’s verdict on Colgate v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:56 am
., P.A. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:13 am
Glidewell Dental Ceramics, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:48 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
