Search for: "State v. P. B." Results 4441 - 4460 of 6,785
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2009, 8:49 am
Gemstate Manufacturing, Inc., 328 Or. 535, 982 P.2d 1108 (1999); Harmon V. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 9:56 pm
The applicant must be in one of the following categories at time of enlistment a. asylee, refugee, Temporary Protected Status (TPS), or b. nonimmigrant categories E, F, H, I, J, K, L, M, O, P, Q, R, S, T, TC, TD, TN, U, or V 2. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:15 am by WSLL
Dep’t of Revenue; Dep’t of Revenue v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It should be noted that two interests at stake — the needs of the child and the needs of the community — are presumptively entitled to equal weight akin to the rulings in Matter of Todd B., Matter of Timothy C., Matter of Pedro A., Matter of Aaron P. and Matter of Horan A. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm by Ronald Mann
For Gorsuch, that evidence only shows that Oklahoma, like many other states, “overstepped its authority in Indian country … [p]erhaps often in good faith, perhaps sometimes not. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Ford Motor Co., 113 P.3d 82, 94-95 (Cal. 2005) (Campbell precludes something called "aggregate disgorgement," which the court analogized to punitive damages); Engle v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:24 pm by Michelle Yeary
P. 81(c)(1), “The[] [federal] rules apply to a civil action after it has been removed from a state court. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 7:05 am
As a result, the increased limits requested are consistent with the provisions of 5-2- 11.7(a)(1)(B)(iv), and those limits have been incorporated into the permit.The IDEM 35-page Response to Comments, which may be accessed via the ILB here, contains much interesting information, including an IDEM response #91 to comments made by Save the Dunes, beginning on p. 33. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 12:58 pm
State/UT-wise trends:  An individual convicted of one or more crimes inviting a sentence of death was more likely to be so punished in the State of Uttar Pradesh. [read post]