Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 4441 - 4460 of 19,571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2017, 8:59 am by Amy Howe
Many court-watchers believed that Phillips’ case might meet a similar fate: If the photography studio couldn’t muster the four votes needed to grant review while the late Justice Antonin Scalia was still on the court, Phillips presumably also would not be able to do so even once Scalia’s successor, Justice Neil Gorsuch, took the bench. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 7:03 am
Justice Alito's opinion for the Court essentially had four parts: first, it applied the Teague v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
  The Karldecision was fractured, with “three separate opinions” and a 2-justice dissent (on a 5-member court). [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:07 am by Amy Howe
News that the five male Justices who voted in favor of the challengers in Burwell v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:42 am by John McFarland
On June 25 the 13th Court of Appeals in Corpus Christi issued is opinion in Devon Energy Production Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Adam Chandler
Still, Justice Alito’s opinion for the Court emphasized that courts’ role in fee disputes is a limited one. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Al-Ko Kober Ltd & Anor v Sambhi [2017] EWHC 2474 (QB), Mrs Justice Whipple took the unusual step of granting an application for: (1) an interim injunction in malicious falsehood; and (2) an order to cease processing personal data under section 10(4) of the Data Protection Act (‘DPA’). [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 3:42 pm
Justice Jennings wrote separately in Marks v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:44 am
  Consider the Supreme Court's first venture onto Youtube in Scott v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:55 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) I was at the Supreme Court this morning for the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 6:55 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The SCC’s decision in Hryniak v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:54 am by Marilyn Stowe
Its impact has been narrowly interpreted by the Scottish courts, and the case of Gow v Grant provides a perfect illustration. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 3:16 am by SHG
And even the ones who do are still children. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
 The granting of declaratory relief is pragmatic and discretionary and can assist in achieving justice between the parties (see Messier-Doughty v Sabena [2001] 1 All ER 275 and Financial Services Authority v Rourke [2002] CP Rep 14; see also Nokia Corp v Interdigital [2006] EWCH Civ 1618; [2007] FSR 23). [read post]