Search for: "Doe 35" Results 4461 - 4480 of 17,233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2012, 1:42 pm
They might, he said, make $20 million overnight, and the IRS was going to take 35% of that away. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
Simply put, when you merely label something as trade secret this does not alone afford the information such status without further action. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:28 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
This en banc CAFC decision is about Hospira's appeal of thedistrict court's ruling that the on-sale bar was NOT triggered.The CAFC affirmed that the on-sale bar was not triggered.The CAFC began the opinion:Today, we consider the circumstances under which aproduct produced pursuant to the claims of a product-byprocesspatent is “on sale” under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:23 am by David A. Altro
In addition, the gift tax rate for 2010, 2011 and 2012 is 35%. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:55 pm by Dennis Crouch
And, you will note that the method claim 17 does not recite any steps that could not be done with pencil and paper. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:49 am
Yael Wexler Normal Michael Geist 2 2009-03-12T13:29:00Z 2009-03-12T13:29:00Z 9 3091 17623 146 35 21642 10.260 96 800x600 On Tuesday, the Commission conducted hearings with leading broadcast and telecom companies including Astral Media, Rogers Communications, Cogeco Cable, Shaw Communications, CTV GlobeMedia, and the CCSA. [read post]
7 May 2022, 8:48 am by Russell Knight
If the Illinois divorce judge does not rule in your favor, you are entitled to appeal that decision within 30 days of the final order (in most cases). [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 2:30 pm
Tossing out the mere germ of an idea does not constitute enabling disclosure. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:19 pm
Indiana Code § 35-42-4-9(a). [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 3:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Mar. 27, 2024), the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a patent infringement lawsuit, holding that the asserted claims of Rady’s US10469250 were ineligible under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 6:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Does StickCo have a credible argument under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
HTC asserts that Apple’s argument effectively narrows the scope of its claims, thereby creating absolute intervening rights under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 2:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Thirty-five percent (35%) disagree, and 17% are undecided. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:05 am by Robert Wagner
(No. 2011-1067) to decide whether the patent false marking statute (35 U.S.C. [read post]