Search for: "In Re L."
Results 4461 - 4480
of 22,389
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2020, 8:52 am
(570) C-A-L-L-D-L-P. [read post]
1 May 2020, 8:52 am
(570) C-A-L-L-D-L-P. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:04 am
F. of L. limited the strike movement. [read post]
1 May 2020, 4:18 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:11 am
France has been hit by an unprecedented economic crisis as a result of COVID-19, with its GDP contracting by 6 per cent in the first quarter of 2020. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:15 pm
You’re one of the lucky ones. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 7:34 am
Current legislative developments An alliance of non-governmental institutions (similar to the coalition that launched the Swiss initiative populaire “entreprises responsables – pour protéger l’être humain et l’environnement” in 2016) has formed the “Initiative Lieferkettengesetz” (Supply chain Law Initiative) with the intention of establishing binding obligations as they can be found in the French Duty of Vigilance Law… [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
" In re Conservatorship of Turner, No. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 3:30 am
It's not easy to justify a Section 18 restriction.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 10:40 am
Ils le sont aussi lorsqu’ils portent sur des exercices et des jeux licites qui tiennent à la seule adresse des parties ou à l’exercice de leur corps, à moins que la somme en jeu ne soit excessive, compte tenu des circonstances, ainsi que de l’état et des facultés des parties. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 8:58 am
· “Social settings” should be limited to a maximum of 10 people; however, “[l]arge venues (e.g., sit-down dining, movie theaters, sporting venues, places of worship) can operate under strict physical distancing protocols. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 8:33 am
Au moment de publier ce billet, une centaine d’instruments non-diagnostiques et une quinzaine d’instruments diagnostiques ont été autorisés de manière accélérée. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON TAGNETICS, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 5:52 am
" Of course, the fact that applicant may be the first and only user does not immunize the mark from being merely descriptive of the services.And so the Board affirmed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlogger comment: So on its face the mark may seem incongruous, but when you drill down to the actual services, maybe not.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 4:58 am
The Delaware courts, in a line of cases beginning with In re Caremark Int’l Inc. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 1:00 am
Monroe Co. 2016), Judge Arthur L. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 1:55 pm
(See Emergency Management and Care Protection Act (EMCPA), subsections 7.0.7(1) and (2) (re declaration of and extension of declaration by cabinet), subsection 7.0.7(3) (re extension by the legislature), section 7.0.8 (re orders made under the declaration). [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:40 am
If you don’t know what you’re going after, man, you’re going to beat up. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:58 am
In re Gault, 367 U.S. 1 (1967). [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:42 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
