Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 156,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2013, 4:15 pm
Delva contended that the legislature intended pregnancy discrimination as a viable action under state law after the adoption of the PDA, evident by the reenactment of the FCRA following O’Loughlin v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 3:58 am
Long (University of Connecticut School of Law) has posted Demosprudence, Interactive Federalism, and Twenty Years of Sheff V. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:55 am
State, 149 Ind. 223, 230; State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
The only news coverage that I've found of yesterday's Supreme Court oral argument in Harbison v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:57 pm
Finally, I've got a draft paper entitled "Leave It to the Lower Courts: On Judicial Intervention in Election Administration," which is to be published in the same Ohio State Law Journal symposium issue of which Profs. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:50 pm
This morning the court issued a 5-4 opinion in Janus v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 12:08 am
Medellin v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:48 am
State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:00 pm
In this case, Covenant Healthcare System, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:00 pm
In this case, Covenant Healthcare System, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:38 pm
(Supreme Court of the State of Idaho, January 29, 2019, Scout LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 7:48 am
Administrative law — Petition for enforcement — Opportunity to answer This case involves a petition for enforcement of administrative subpoena, filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City by the State of Maryland Commission on Civil Rights, appellee (“the Commission”), seeking production of the personnel files of certain employees of Baltimore County, Maryland, deployed to ... [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:56 pm
As for the competing Convention rights (the family’s Article 8 rights to privacy and the importance of free press reporting under Article 10), the judge relied upon the ruling of the Supreme Court in R(C) v Secretary of State for Justice ([2016] UKSC 2) where Lady Hale observed: “First, neither article has as such precedence over the other. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 10:22 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a brief and straightforward per curiam opinion today in V.L. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
Passing these types of laws has been a recent trend in the states, spurred by those who want to see Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:03 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 5:22 am
The trial court decided that a former wife could not sue her former husband for his taping of her telephone calls under either federal or state law. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 12:23 pm
The post Predicting a Fragmented Vote in <i>United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
L.A. v. [read post]
