Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 4461 - 4480
of 15,315
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2019, 2:38 pm
Here the state adopts an approach emblematic of private governance. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 12:00 am
” c. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
CopyrightKat Eleonora Rosati analyses the Advocate General’s opinion in Pelham and Others, C-476/17, which was referred to the CJEU by the German Federal Court of Justice. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
Andrew B. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
A judgment is the judge’s expressed reasons for making a decision. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 9:16 pm
The grounds for an action for annulmentBMS's action for annulment of the decision was based on (i) violation of Article 5(12)(b) of the Orphan Regulation in conjunction with the principle of proportionality; (ii) violation of Article 5(12)(b) in conjunction with Article 5(8); and (iii) failure to identify the legal basis and to state reasons. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:35 pm
” Finally, in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:20 pm
Jorgensen and Donald C. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 10:54 am
Specifically, F.S. 775.15(2)(b), (c) and (d) requires prosecution of second- and third-degree felonies commenced within three years of the incident, first-degree misdemeanors within two years and second-degree misdemeanors/ noncriminal violations within one year. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:35 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 3:36 am
¿Aún no estás suscrito a Microjuris? [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
OPINION EVELYN V. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
P. 166a(c). [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 11:13 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
See Appellant’s Br., Norman v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
B. [read post]