Search for: "United States v. Was" Results 4461 - 4480 of 102,810
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2023, 10:44 am by Admin
United States, No. 22-6023 (6th Cir. 2023) to highlight the difficulty posed by attempts to force the IRS’s hand in areas in which it hasn’t issued guidance, particularly on cryptocurrency. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:58 am by Michael C. Dorf
The most famous example is probably Andrew Jackson's veto of the bill to renew the charter of the Bank of the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Code of Civil Procedure section 2094 states as follows: (a) An oath, affirmation, or declaration in an action or a proceeding, may be administered by obtaining an affirmative response to one of the following questions: (1) “Do you solemnly state that the evidence you shall give in this issue (or matter) shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 10:31 am by NARF
Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana (Remand to State Court; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 10:22 am
United States (1875) – most eminent domain actions have focused on real estate matters. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 9:28 am by Tom Smith
  A review of thousands of pages of hearing transcripts reveal that Chutkan has repeatedly expressed strong and settled opinions about the issues at the heart of United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by M. Jeanette Pitts
Because the new statute does not include the procedural protections present in the federal pretrial detention statute upheld in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
She was the United States Solicitor General when the challenges to the statute were being resolved by the lower courts. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
United States (2015), the Supreme Court held that the fish was not a "record. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Unknown
The SEC’s response to the Chamber of Commerce’s petition for review of the Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization rulemaking, whose timing coincided with the imposition of an excise tax on buybacks under the Inflation Reduction Act, at length seeks to refute the Chamber’s First Amendment claims, while also seeking to bolster the rigor of the agency’s economic analysis (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]