Search for: "DOES 1-12" Results 4481 - 4500 of 28,892
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2019, 2:26 pm by Linda A. Kerns
Therefore, in this case, because Mother and Father agree, requirement § 5325(2)(ii) is not met and Grandmother does not have standing to file for custody of Child. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Enlarged Board of Appeal decisions G 9/92 [12] and G 4/93 [1]). [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 12:11 pm by Mark Young
Furthermore, a finding of invalidity of the Directive does not cancel the ability for Member States under the e-Privacy Directive (2002/58/EC) to oblige retention of data. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:27 am by Jon Hyman
Elkton-Pigeon-Bay Port Laker Schools (6th Cir. 1/17/12) [pdf] provides some guidance. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 4:10 am
The follow-up EBoA decisions Broccoli/Tomatoes II (G2/12 and G2/13, IPKat post here) found that the Article 53(b) exclusion should be interpreted narrowly. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:33 am
Does international law reflect the values of the international community? [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 8:52 am by Wolfgang Demino
BILL OF REVIEW IN PROBATE CASE: WHEN DOES IT HAVE TO BE FILED TO BE TIMELY UNDER THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS? [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 12:25 am by Jon L. Gelman
The split decision (2-1) of the three-judge panel upholds vaccine mandates against COVID infections for places of employment having 100 or more employees. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 5:53 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The district court granted WildTangent’s preanswermotion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  DT alleged two creative aspects: (1) the USB drive had 12 equal sides, whereas the icon had 20 unequal sides; and (2) DT designed the USB drive to fit into the PlumbBob with a “futuristic cut away look . . . at a unique angle. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 11:45 am by Unknown
”Nor does the Board have to wait for a work rule to be enforced before it acts, as it “has long and consistently recognized that an employer’s mere maintenance of a work rule may unlawfully interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees in the exercise of their Section 7 rights. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 8:52 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
BILL OF REVIEW IN PROBATE CASE: WHEN DOES IT HAVE TO BE FILED TO BE TIMELY UNDER THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS? [read post]