Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 4481 - 4500 of 8,598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2014, 1:00 pm
I am writing, of course, about National Federation of Businesses v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
Those convictions were vacated because the trial court abused its discretion by allowing an FBI agent to testify as both an expert and lay witness. [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– McLean, VA lawyer Mark McKinnon of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Plane-ly Spoken Laying the Groundwork for Natural Gas Vehicles – The blogging lawyers and attorneys at Morrison Foerster on their blog, MofoTech For more of the best, check out LXBN, a complete review of the top insight and commentary across the LexBlog Network. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:35 am
The Supreme Court decided one case today, Petrella v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:07 am by Richard M. Re
As part of my ongoing quest to discover under-appreciated jurisdictional issues, I'd like to return to the Court's recent decision in Town of Greece v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:58 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the employer’s motion for summary judgment was granted (Moncel v Sullivan’s of Indiana, Inc, May 13, 2014, Lawrence, W). [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
 So this moggy is enormously grateful to his EIP colleague Matthew Jones, for preparing a report of this case, which came out at the same time as the Actavis v Lilly decision. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"In April, Texas' Seventh Court of Appeals, agreed in a case called Sutherland v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
Business agents for a laborer’s union local sued the union, along with its business manager and president, contending they violated the Michigan Whistleblowers’ Protection Act by laying the agents off “indefinitely” in retaliation for reporting suspected fraud and embezzlement and other misconduct to the DOL. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:43 am by Ron Coleman
Republished by Blog Post PromoterA court seems, according to this synopsis by Eric Goldman, to lay it out straight in dismissing a case brought in California against Craigslist. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:48 pm by Dennis Crouch
A key to his reasoning may be found in his earlier opinion in Cuno Engineering Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"*The Appellate Division agreed, finding that the reduced contribution, which in turn increased the amounts withheld from judicial salaries as employee contribution towards health insurance premiums, constitutes an unconstitutional diminution of judicial compensation.The court explained that the reduction in the State’s employer contribution for health insurance premiums occurred in 2011 when the State, faced with a serious budget shortfall, threatened to lay off thousands of… [read post]