Search for: "Martin v. Martin"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 6,968
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2010, 3:52 am
The arbitrator’s ruling is consistent with the court’s ruling in the Lekkas case [Martin ex rel Lekkas, 86 AD2d 712]. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:10 am
Courts have viewed employees who lack licenses as being "unqualified," in contrast to being "incompetent," to perform the duties of the position.In contrast, see Matter of Martin ex rel Lekkas, 86 AD2d 712. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:56 pm
" In that November 2007 decision in a case known as state v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 12:26 am
I have also filed an amicus brief in Martin v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:23 am
Cir. 2012); Adverio Pharma GmbH v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:12 am
A secure tenant could abandon or withdraw application for right to buy otherwise than by service of written notice under s.122(3) - Copping v Surrey County Council [2006] HLR 307 - or may "abandon or waive his right to buy under normal principles of common law and equity or may be estopped from continuing to exercise it", Martin v Medina Housing Association Ltd [2006] HLR 763. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 10:45 pm
The facts of this case as presented are wholly different from those in the Musah case [City Council of Bristol v Martin Mousah (1998) 30 HLR 32] and those in the Stonebridge Housing case. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:12 am
A secure tenant could abandon or withdraw application for right to buy otherwise than by service of written notice under s.122(3) - Copping v Surrey County Council [2006] HLR 307 - or may "abandon or waive his right to buy under normal principles of common law and equity or may be estopped from continuing to exercise it", Martin v Medina Housing Association Ltd [2006] HLR 763. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:59 pm
He and an accomplice planned to steal money from Martin Silvester, a prospective buyer. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
Lockheed-Martin v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:29 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in the famous case of Martin v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:16 pm
Martin, 65 P.3d 866 (Wa. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 11:37 pm
[Youdas], 13 AD3d 1044, 1045 [2004]; see also Rowell v Utica Mutual Ins. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:50 am
What Ricci v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 7:27 pm
Connearney v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:32 am
By Michael TarrantEaton v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 9:15 am
Ass'n v. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Trial JudgeR. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
A third interim order was made in March 2021 after a contested application by the father to have the child returned to Chilliwack (SZM v KMN, 2021 BCSC 365 (CanLII), (which was decided before Barendregt v Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22 (CanLII), more on the significance of this case below)). [read post]
