Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 39,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
” Comment There is certainly a danger that this decision may have a chilling effect on the willingness of some public authorities to outsource their core functions. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
” Comment There is certainly a danger that this decision may have a chilling effect on the willingness of some public authorities to outsource their core functions. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:22 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Penfold v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1222 (01 June 2012) Gilbert v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1221 (01 June 2012) Saunders v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1185 (01 June 2012) Sandhu v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1187 (01 June 2012) Clark & Anor v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1220 (01 June 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) B (A Child), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 737 (31 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Bento v The Chief… [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:39 pm
In his dissent in yesterday's Boumediene v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am
As is well known, at the common law, following Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2011] 1 WLR 1985, “defamatory” incorporates a qualification or threshold of seriousness: “the publication of which [a claimant] complains may be defamatory of him because it [substantially] affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards him, or has a tendency to do so. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
Strasbourg may need to clarify its decision in Colon and its implications for Gillan. [read post]
26 Mar 2006, 10:23 am
I’m sure for some men that’s true, but there are a lot of reasons why someone may not want a child other than paying child support. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:37 am
This may be cold comfort to Sullivan and his defenders, but we might as well get the story right, and the difference is important for reasons discussed below. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm
[Cite to Nunes v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:29 am
United StatesLindke v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:17 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:06 am
But believing is enough to make a lot of otherwise smart people lose their minds. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm
A portion of this was seized in May 2017 following the execution of a search warrant, and has remained in federal custody ever since. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:58 pm
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp" "Debt Collection Text May Result in Liability under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act -- Gutierrez v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
This follows from the fact that, even if one accepts an Applicant’s argument that a Respondent has violated its obligations is “plausible,” the Respondent’s argument that it has not violated its obligations may be equally plausible, or it may even be more plausible, or it may in fact even be probable. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:39 am
That was the issue in Fasch v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am
Secondly, Google may have separate defences as to quantum in respect of the individual claims. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 8:48 am
By Dennis Crouch SmartGene v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 9:41 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 12:06 pm
In Williams v. [read post]