Search for: "People v. New"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 41,465
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2016, 6:40 am
On November 10, 2016 the Supreme Court of New Jersey a decision in the matter of State-v-Bryant, the Court addressed the balance of protecting victims of domestic violence and individual privacy rights. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:39 am
In June, we told you the Supreme Court agreed to hear United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 2:45 am
In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:18 am
The complaint (full text) in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
O’Dell edited a book on Older People in Modern Ireland which contains various interesting essays), today’s decision is at odds with a trend towards a greater understanding of human rights and older people (although of course the House of Lords did not have that question before it). [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 2:19 pm
Some want a new society [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 1:56 pm
People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 8:50 am
People v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
People v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 10:13 am
People v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
v=7Qn3tel9FWU Video available at KCCI News Center. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
H is for Happy New Year! [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:32 am
See Mapp v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:36 am
Like McCoy v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 1:34 pm
People v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
New York.] [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
In Elektra Entertainment Group v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:40 pm
Put another way, this is an effort by the Obama administration to show it does not need to put people into a regime of long-term military detention in order to ensure that alleged terrorists are adequately mined for whatever intelligence value they might have. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 8:12 pm
Previously, the New York Court of Appeals had affirmed a rejection of that claim (People v Ramchair, 8 NY3d 313, 316 [2007]) reasoning that appellate counsel's brief to the Appellate Division had been “comprehensive,” and the arguments raised therein “strong” (Id.). [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:12 am
From Usefully Employed (hat-tip) comes the news that the consultation on the Equality Bill proposes the introduction of indirect discrimination as a category, which would help with the horlicks that the Lords made of the 1995 Act in Malcolm v Lewisham: [the Bill shall] adopt the concept of indirect discrimination for the purposes of the disability discrimination provisions in the Equality Bill, rather than carry forward to the Equality Bill the existing provisions in the Disability… [read post]
