Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 4481 - 4500 of 55,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 11:06 am by Zach Zagger
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website, JURIST news archive] ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday in American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:11 pm by Howard Wasserman
This offers an opportunity to revive and underrated William Brennan First Amendment opinion--Board of Island Trees v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:42 am
Encountered in reading I assigned:For a century the States had submitted, with murmurs, to the commercial restrictions imposed by the parent State; and now, finding themselves in the unlimited possession of those powers over their own commerce, which they had so long been deprived of, and so earnestly coveted, that selfish principle which, well controlled, is so salutary, and which, unrestricted, is so unjust and tyrannical, guided by inexperience and jealousy, began to show itself in… [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 1:58 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Awards for attorney's fees, and contract law generally, are topics in the case Buckhorn v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
I'm just don't think that Missouri v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm by Howard Friedman
 While serving in that role, she was one of the attorneys who wrote the U.S. government's brief in City of Boerne v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:25 am by Jordan Schneider
v=_HxkMKb_EQs Click here to listen to ChinaTalk in your favorite podcast app [read post]
The Supreme Court’s recent summer decision in Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana, et al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 6:00 am by Chris Williams
[The Texas Tribune] * Turns out Pepe does not go to the moon: 500k lawsuit follows after an NFT buyers faces the power of ctrl + v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 9:12 pm by Patent Docs
Supreme Court decision in Impression Products v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
This prompted ALittleRebellion to make Bad Legal Takes for insisting that "no judge has the power to remove any executive appointee. [read post]