Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 9,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2015, 1:52 pm
We in the United States have committed ourselves – not only through our Constitution, but also through a variety of state and federal laws and policies – to religious freedom. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:51 am
The case is Doe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:51 am
The case is Doe v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
Specifically, the webinar involved a discussion of non-compete and trade secret issues in Europe and China as compared to the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 8:08 am
After meeting with the then-president of the United States Conference of Catholic bishops (Archbishop Timothy Dolan of New York), President Barack Obama and HHS announced an accommodation to the bishops’ objection. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:07 am
Hayes Fund for the First United Methodist Church of Welsh, LLC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:07 am
Hayes Fund for the First United Methodist Church of Welsh, LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:59 am
The case is Friedrichs v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:33 am
Even if this judgment is wrong, the United States has compelling interests in sustaining the mandate and this accommodation. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
The most recent affirmative action case before the Supreme Court of the United States is Fisher v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:07 pm
For the new birth control cases, it is important to emphasize at the outset that, while religious freedom in the United States often becomes a constitutional dispute, the Court has chosen not to consider any of the current round of protests based on a constitutional claim. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 1:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:00 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Bollinger in 2003 upholding the University of Michigan Law School’s use of race to suggest that there is a clear time limit on the ability of governments in the United States to take race into account in university admissions. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
United States, 296 F.3d 1237 (11th Cir. 2002). [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:33 am
& Clinics v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:03 am
They are jointly liable as a marital unit ― probably not a surprise to you ― meaning that the IRS can go after them as a couple. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
Over the last few months I had the opportunity to work with some fantastic immigration attorneys across the Southeast United States on a collaborative project. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 11:23 am
Weexplained that the Board’s interpretation of its regulationsin denying the proposed amendment was reasonableunder the particular circumstances in Proxyconn and wasconsistent with the United States Patent and TrademarkOffice’s (“PTO’s”) position expressed in the Board’s informativedecision in Idle Free Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:27 am
The company did pay the AMT in 2015 “based entirely on Wal-Mart PR’s purchases of goods and services from related entities in the mainland United States. [read post]
