Search for: "County v. State" Results 4501 - 4520 of 33,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2013, 6:49 am by Kate Fort
Oneida Indian Nation of New York State, 470 U.S. 266 (1985) and City of Sherrill v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 2:14 pm by Steven M. Sweat
Superior Court of Los Angeles County that universities in the state have a duty to protect their students from violent acts that are foreseeable. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 2:14 pm by Steven M. Sweat
Superior Court of Los Angeles County that universities in the state have a duty to protect their students from violent acts that are foreseeable. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:01 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Article XIII, §13(a) of the State Constitution, as amended in 1989, deleted the words "The county shall never be made responsible for the acts of the sheriff. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 6:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court finds the County lacked substantial evidence that plaintiff is a danger to safety of others.The case is Henry v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:04 pm
It's one that's a fairly fundamental distinction between, say, America, as opposed to other types of totalitarian police states out there.But the Ninth Circuit today says: No. [read post]